Tool 25 of 32
Gate-First Sequencing
Anything whose outcome could change other work is a gate, and gates run first no matter how small they look.
In Plan, on the candidate task list, after the depth verdict and the ranked moves exist.
Step 6 of 7 · Days 9 and 10
In what order, by whom?
A plan is an order of operations, not a list of good ideas. Everyone knows what they are doing, what done looks like, and why this comes before that.
Plans fail for boring reasons. Too much at once, goals that quietly cancel each other, big irreversible moves made before cheap informative ones, and a plan that reads well on day one and means nothing by day 30 because nobody knows who does what.
Skipping here because planning feels like progress before the pattern is confirmed. A plan built that early is a guess with a schedule.
Tool 25 of 32
Anything whose outcome could change other work is a gate, and gates run first no matter how small they look.
In Plan, on the candidate task list, after the depth verdict and the ranked moves exist.
Tool 26 of 32
Finds goal pairs that quietly cancel each other before they become one uncontrolled experiment.
In Plan, on every pair of goals that will run at the same time, inside the sequencing work.
Tool 27 of 32
Weights certainty over cheapness, because one hard, certain move beats five easy hopeful ones.
In Plan, on the candidate move list, after gates are marked and the stop line exists.
Tool 28 of 32
Every change to the plan gets a written price before it is accepted. Nothing is absorbed silently.
Any time a change to the committed plan is requested, before that change takes effect, and again at every checkpoint next to the baseline.
Tool 29 of 32
Pairs every stream of invisible deep work with a visible number that buys it patience.
In Plan, from the Value-Source Audit's numbers, then reviewed weekly, indicator first, for as long as the deep work stays invisible.